<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://timeforchange.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Nuclear power</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New Finish nuclear power plant Olkiluoto with enormous financial losses</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/new-finish-nuclear-power-plant-olkiluoto-enormous-financial-losses</link>
 <description>&lt;h2&gt;Nuclear giant Areva threatens halt of Olkiluoto construction &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The dispute around enormous financial losses from the Finish Olkiluoto nuclear reactor project deepened yesterday, when the French nuclear giant Areva published its half-year results. &lt;b&gt;Areva threatened to freeze construction if TVO does not submit to the company’s demands of shouldering a share of the cost. The latest estimate of construction costs reached €5.5 billion, which compares to the price of 2.5 billion originally presented to Finnish public and politicians.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/new-finish-nuclear-power-plant-olkiluoto-enormous-financial-losses&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/new-finish-nuclear-power-plant-olkiluoto-enormous-financial-losses#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:19:52 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">720 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nuclear Proliferation in a nutshell</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/what-is-nuclear-proliferation-nutshell</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Nuclear proliferation is used to describe the spread of fissile material, weapons-applicable nuclear technology and information, to nations which are not (yet) in posession of nuclear weapons. It is feared that the likelyhood of a nuclear warfare does increase with the number of nations with nuclear weapons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nuclear proliferation&lt;b&gt; is related to the civil application of nuclear power&lt;/b&gt; in the following ways: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/what-is-nuclear-proliferation-nutshell&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/what-is-nuclear-proliferation-nutshell#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:20:58 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">663 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nuclear Power phase-out is pro-gressing</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-power-phase-out-pro-gressing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Nuclear energy is a relatively small industry, but one with big
problems. It covers just one-sixteenth of the world’s primary energy
consumption, a share set to decline over the coming decades. &lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The
average age of operating commercial nuclear reactors is 23 years.
This means that more power stations are being shut down than built.
In 2007, world nuclear production fell by 1.8 % and the number of
operating reactors was 439, five less than the historical peak of 2002.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-power-phase-out-pro-gressing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-power-phase-out-pro-gressing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:40:50 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">655 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is nuclear power a global warming solution?</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/newsletter-2008-oct-18</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The main topic of this newsletter is the following question:&lt;b&gt; Is nuclear power a global warming solution? &lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In addition, we summarize and link a number of texts about the potential and about the future of civil nuclear power applications.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/newsletter-2008-oct-18&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/timeforchange-news">Time for change</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:45:05 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">654 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Who is building new nuclear power plants?</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/who-builds-new-nuclear-power-plants-future</link>
 <description>There has been a lot of talking about the renaissance of nuclear power
in the light of global warming and increasing oil prices. So let&#039;s have
a look at the global situation: Who is building new nuclear power
stations and who is just talking about?
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/who-builds-new-nuclear-power-plants-future&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/who-builds-new-nuclear-power-plants-future#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:47:08 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">649 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Weblog from Greenpeace about the meltdown of the nuclear industry</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/weblog-about-meltdown-nuclear-industry</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Greenpeace has announced a new weblog about the downsides of the nuclear industry.The blog is called &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;Greenpeace weblog about the downside of the nuclear industry&quot;&gt;Nuclear Reaction&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; - blogging the meltdown of the nuclear industry&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The About-Section says: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Welcome to Nuclear Reaction, where we&#039;ll be recording for history the meltdown of that most over-rated, over-subsidised and over-confident of industries, the nuclear industry.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/weblog-about-meltdown-nuclear-industry&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:49:12 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">637 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Olkiluoto: Finlands new nuclear power plant</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/olkiluoto-finlands-new-nuclear-power-plant-cost-electricity</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Finland&#039;s Olkiluoto nuclear power plant: The Olkiluoto construction project in Finland is rapidly becoming an example of all that can go wrong in economic terms with nuclear new build. It demonstrates the key problems of construction delays, cost overruns and hidden subsidies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/olkiluoto-finlands-new-nuclear-power-plant-cost-electricity&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/olkiluoto-finlands-new-nuclear-power-plant-cost-electricity#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:16:10 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">635 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/co2-emission-nuclear-power-stations-electricity</link>
 <description>&lt;b&gt;How much CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is produced by atomic energy? &lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One of the few pros of nuclear power is the relatively low emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the major causes of global warming. For this reason, it has been proposed as &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; method to mitigate the effects of climate change. However a recent life cycle analysis showed that nuclear power produces 4 to 10 times higher CO2 emissions per kWh electricity than renewable energies. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/co2-emission-nuclear-power-stations-electricity&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/co2-emission-nuclear-power-stations-electricity#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/carbon-dioxide">Carbon dioxide</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/global-warming-solutions">global warming solutions</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:58:04 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">627 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cost of electricity from new nuclear power stations</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/advantages-cost-electricity-new-nuclear-power-stations</link>
 <description>Current discussions about possibilities to mitigate the effects of global warming have also opened discussions about a potential revival of nuclear power. In this context, it is often argued with very low cost of electricity from nuclear power plants. This seems to be one of the strongest arguments in favor of atomic energy. To determine the future cost of electricity from nuclear power, the cost from currently operating power stations is taken into account. This is not correct, however.
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/advantages-cost-electricity-new-nuclear-power-stations&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/advantages-cost-electricity-new-nuclear-power-stations#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:56:35 +0200</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">620 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nuclear power station causing cancer</title>
 <link>http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-power-station-causing-cancer-leukemia</link>
 <description>An official study from the German government shows the risk of getting cancer is significantly increasing for small children growing up in the neighborhood of a nuclear power station. This is in particular true for leukemia, a special case of cancer.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-power-station-causing-cancer-leukemia&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-power-station-causing-cancer-leukemia#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/current_issues">Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://timeforchange.org/global-warming/nuclear-power">Nuclear power</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:29:25 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>juerg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">602 at http://timeforchange.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
